{"id":1058,"date":"2024-10-28T08:17:47","date_gmt":"2024-10-28T08:17:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/?p=1058"},"modified":"2024-10-28T08:17:47","modified_gmt":"2024-10-28T08:17:47","slug":"slovenacki-referendum-o-jek2-definitivno-odlozen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/2024\/10\/28\/slovenacki-referendum-o-jek2-definitivno-odlozen\/","title":{"rendered":"Slovena\u010dki referendum o JEK2 definitivno odlo\u017een"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Slovena\u010dki poslanici su i definitivno glasali za poni\u0161tavanje referenduma o izgradnji nove nuklearne elektrane nakon \u0161to su ekolo\u0161ke grupe i stru\u010dnjaci podneli \u017ealbe ustavnom sudu dovode\u0107i u pitanje njegovu legalnost\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"682\" src=\"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/1280px-Nuklearna_elektrarna_Krsko-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"Nuklearna elektrana Kr\u0161ko. Foto: Wikimedia\" class=\"wp-image-512\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/1280px-Nuklearna_elektrarna_Krsko-1024x682.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/1280px-Nuklearna_elektrarna_Krsko-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/1280px-Nuklearna_elektrarna_Krsko-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/1280px-Nuklearna_elektrarna_Krsko.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Nuklearna elektrana Kr\u0161ko. Foto: Wikimedia<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Od ukupno 90 poslanika slovena\u010dkog parlamenta, njih \u0161ezdeset devet je glasalo za poni\u0161tavanje javnog referenduma, jedan je bio protiv, a jedan uzdr\u017ean iako je isti taj parlament ranije ovog meseca odlu\u010dio da referendum raspi\u0161e. Referendumsko pitanje je bilo: \u201eDa li podr\u017eavate realizaciju projekta JEK 2, koji \u0107e zajedno sa drugim niskougljeni\u010dnim izvorima obezbediti stabilno snabdevanje elektri\u010dnom energijom?\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Referendum je trebalo da bude odr\u017ean 24. Novembra.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ali javno kritikovanje i pitanja u vezi projekta dovela su do toga da poslani\u010dke grupe <a href=\"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/2024\/10\/22\/hitno-referendum-o-jek2-projektu-ipak-pod-znakom-pitanja\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">povuku<\/a> svoju podr\u0161ku referendumu. Neko poslanici su rekli da postoje opravdane sumnje da li bi bira\u010di mogli doneti informisanu, autonomnu i odgovornu odluku o takvom pitanju. \u201eLi\u010dno sam zadovoljna \u0161to referenduma ne\u0107e biti\u201c, rekla je predsednica Slovenije Nata\u0161a Pirc Musar, a prenosi dr\u017eavna novinska agencija STA. \u201eUvek \u0107u isticati da je za ovakav referendum potrebno znatno vi\u0161e informacija.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>World Nuclear News, me\u0111utim spekuli\u0161e da se referendumska odluka u ovom slu\u010daju samo odlo\u017eila za &#8211; tako\u0111e spekuli\u0161e WNN &#8211; 2028 godinu.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-right\">S.A.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Slovena\u010dki poslanici su i definitivno glasali za poni\u0161tavanje referenduma o izgradnji nove nuklearne elektrane nakon \u0161to su ekolo\u0161ke grupe i<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":512,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[64,65],"class_list":["post-1058","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-vesti","tag-jek2","tag-slovenija"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1058","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1058"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1058\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1059,"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1058\/revisions\/1059"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/512"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1058"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1058"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nuklearnaperspektiva.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1058"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}